Mr. Ronald J. Wieck:Just exactly what would your qualifications be to assess that Field McConnell, Lt. Col. USAF (Ret.), a former NORAD air defense F4 & F16 fighter pilot with the North Dakota Air National Guard at Fargo, is, to quote you, "... peddling bullshit"???
Moreover, and to the point, why even discuss "ground effect" when there was no Boeing 757 involved in the Pentagon paradigm, save for propaganda purposes of "Muslim" hi-jackers, when there weren't any of these either? You're completely off point.
American 77 was destroyed approximately 40-minutes PRIOR to the Pentagon hit, in Warning Airspace W-386 out over the Atlantic Ocean.
The aerial weapon that struck the Pentagon is thought to be a Raytheon modified U.S. Navy A-3 Sky Warrior, equipped with a variant of either the Raytheon Maverick AGM-12 Bullpup or later Maverick AGM-65 missile. The parts recovered at the Pentagon evidence and support this fact.
And it is our contention that if the missing frames of Pentagon video are ever released, which we highly doubt, you would clearly see this aerial weapon. If your government has nothing to hide, why don't they simply release the missing video frames? You and I well know the answer to that question.
Do your homework, sir. This isn't rocket science, but there seems to be a number of official disinformation artists hard at work to keep the 911 fairy tale alive. And you appear to be one of them.
My sincerest regards,
John R. Prukop/ATP
Abel Danger PR/Legal
Seattle, WA
No comments:
Post a Comment