MUSA Family Values - Part 3

CASE NO: FD10C0195

In our continuing story on the ABUSE of Haringey Child Services and the loss of their children, Mr. and Mrs. Musa are fighting a battle to get their children back. They now wish to leave the UK as they have been treated so badly by the Government and Child Services or Social Services, and that is a laugh. Haringey still have not given information as to where their daughter Favour is and what has happened to her. This story should hold a red flag for anyone who has children in the UK, most of all new immigrants to the UK. So in we find someone who cares is offering a reward as follows.

Dear media,
Please put all or part of the following in your publication. Thank you.

Favour Musa has been sexually molested whilst in her foster home having been removed via illegal means from her loving family in Haringey, N. London. Ever since she told her parents about her being molested she has disappeared - all contact visits with her parents were stopped by the council and she has not been seen by any family connected to her for nearly a year since she made the allegation. This is totally illegal regarding children in foster care, the family's Human Rights, and the orders the court gave when removing the child {on totally fictitious evidence by the way} but the council at Haringey have got away with it - and a LOT MORE!
Is she dead?
Has she been trafficked abroad?
Can anybody help this vulnerable child?

Anonymous Donour offers Award for a video of eldest Musa daughter Favour
£1,000 for anyone who produces a video of Favour in which she recounts:

her experiences since April 2010 when she was taken, up to the present day, including
if and when she was abused and by whom
why she refused to see her mother or speak to her by phone if indeed that was the case
whether she really wrote the letter in the garden saying she and the other children were beaten by her mother or denying both letter and beatings if that is the case
whether or not she has asked to go to court and been refused
how often she sees her brother and her sisters
and if she or her siblings have been staying at all with Michelle Collins.

Now, I would like to express regret as the Musa's have endured so much hate at the hand of :

 

THIS IS THE BARRISTER THAT STARTED THE CASE WITH ROSITA MOISE TO REMOVE THE MUSA CHILDREN. SHE TOOK THE CASE TO THE HIGH COURT. SHE CONSPIRED WITH ROSITA TO UNDERMINE THE INTERGRITY OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. SHE ACCUSED THE MUSA PARENTS OF CHILD TRAFFICKING ,OF GLORIA MUSA BEING A SEX WORKER ETC , AND WHEN THE LOWER COURT TOLD HER TO RETURN THE CHILDREN, SHE REFUSED AND WENT TO HIGH COURT IN HOLBORN TO START A PROCEEDING

Cliona Papazian

Year of call: 1994

Education / Qualifications

BA MA (National University of Ireland, University College Cork)
LLB (National University of Wales, College of Cardiff)

Qualified Collaborative Lawyer

Specialist practice areas

Adoption

Care Proceedings

International Child Cases and Child Abduction

Children Act Proceedings

International Movement of Children

Wardship/Inherent Jurisdiction

Forced Marriage

Court of Protection

ADR

Collaborative Lawyer

Profile

Cliona is a specialist family practitioner. She has particular interest and experience of child care cases involving complex medical evidence and allegations of sexual abuse.  She is regularly instructed in cases involving children by Parents, Local Authorities and Guardians.  A significant proportion of Cliona's practice is now concentrated on international child abduction and Cliona regularly acts Plaintiffs and Defendants and Children in the Hague, BRII R and Non - Convention cases.  She appeared in the recently reported important case Re RD (Child Abduction) (Brussels II Revised: articles 11(7) and (19) 2008 EWHC 2030 (FAM).

Professional Memberships

Family Law Bar Association
Inner Temple
Affiliate Member of Resolution

The Chambers of Jonathan Cohen QC
4 Paper Building, Temple
London, EC4Y 7EX

Tel:020 7583 0816

Fax:020 7353 4979

DX:LDE 1035

Out of hours:07810 482828

That is the lawyer but what of the witnesses, or so called witnesses: now here is a list of people who have been involved with this case, and have lied continuously about the treatment of the MUSA children. Even Actresses need to get involved. All of this seems to be more involved than we are led to believe or that has been out in the press.

A GRAVE MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE by the UK JUDICIARY

AGAINST A NIGERIAN FAMILY

INVOLVING ACTRESS MICHELLE COLLINS - FORMER Actress from EASTENDERS

'CINDY BEALE' - NOW MAKING A DEBUT IN CORONATION STREET!

THE BELOW IS A LIST OFALL INVOLVED DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY IN THE GRAVE, EVIL, VILE AND DESPICABLE INJUSTICE MR AND MRS MUSA (NOT UK NATIONALS) ARE haxving to endure by London Borough of Harringey.  How many others have they abused / tortured with their wicked ways (we may never know).

There is something SERIOUSLY WRONG when theDIRECTOR (MS BADHAN) OF HARRINGEY SOCIAL SERVICES VISITS YOUR HOME.

MS BADHAN -VISITED THIS FAMILY TWO WEEKS AGO- offering them A PASSPORT so they could return to their native homeland (NIGERIA) AND LEAVE THEIR CHILDREN IN THE UK.  Obviously, THEY REFUSED the offer!

Michelle Collins

FORMER ACTRESS FROM EASTENDERS - NOW ACTING IN CORONATION STREET - she has incited others to commit perjury, pervert the course of justice.  She LIED TO THE SOCIAL SERVICES by reporting the mother of this family concerned (Mrs Musa) of being a CHILD TRAFFICKER / PROSTITUTE  and many other UNTRUE ALLEGATIONS.

In FEBRUARY 2011, MS COLLINSrequested THE JUDGE -His Honour Judge GLENN BRASSE(CIRCUIT JUDGE) to ensure the press would not be present at the end of the hearing, to tprotect her CAREER, regardless of the number of childrens LIVES HER ORIGINAL ALLEGATIONS HAS DESTROYED.

MY FAMILY has been TORN APART because of my

choice of 'association with this family - MY grandchildren (various ages), DAUGHTER (29 yrs old) and SON (aged 7 yrs) have ALL been seriously affected indirectly by this

MICHELLE COLLINS' VILE woman's actions against Mr and Mrs Musa.  SHE IS RESPONSIBILE  for BREAKING MY CHILDREN'S AND GRAND-

CHILDREN'S HEARTS! AND the hearts of INNOCENT FAMILIES who live in London Borough of Harringey.

I HAVE BEEN PERSONALLY affected by ALL LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT because I have LOST almost ALL of my possessions and have had to MOVE FROM THE UK to protect my own son.

Paul RANDLE-JOLLIFFEhas ALSO LOST HIS HOME ALSO and does not see his child since he has represented Mr and Mrs Musa as their McKenzie friend and beenseriously affected by his 'choice of association' with the family.

A LARGE NUMBER of families have been affected by MS MICHELLE COLLINS' actions.  EVERYONE who has been involved or made friends with this family has either been moved (some to locations no one knows), 'disappeared' (ST ANNE'S HOSPITALseems to also be a 'main player' in this - LBH USE THEM ALOT to 'accommodate new mothers ONCE THEIR BABIES have been born.  THOSE MOTHERS NEVER see their babies again!  Families have either had their children TAKEN INTO CARE and not returned or they (if they were lucky and desserted helping/ being friends with this family) have got their children back home to live.

WHEN parents have contact at CAPSTONE VISION,KENT(a place where families have Supervised contact) - THEY NEVER SEE THEIR CHILDREN AGAIN.

CARIS (A charity for Homeless people, based in London Borough of Harringey) :INDIRA (as below) IS A CLOSE FRIEND OF MICHELLE COLLINS.... what other lengths will they go to to cover up their sick, vile and evil crimes?

IN FEBRUARY 2011,  JUDGE GLENN BRASSESTATED IN COURT ALL evidence originally submitted before the Court in April 2010 WAS FAKED, FALSE, BUT HE still continues to keep the children in the care of London BOROUGH OF HARRINGEY, using FALSE ALLEGATIONS....

ALL THE REPORTS MADE from others - have been based on the HEARSAY EVIDENCE (as confirmed False/ Fake by Judge Glenn Brasse)have been 'used' to keep the children AWAY from the parents.  Judge Glenn Brasse stated: there was NO CASE TO ANSWER (February 2011) and since then LBH have been creating MORE (false/fake) allegations against the family.

REGARDLESS ofJUDGE GLENN BRASSE STATING an original (alleged) letter from the eldest daughter (then aged 9 yrs old) IS A FAKE..... MS SUZANNE MOORE - INDEPENDENT SOCIAL WORKER - HAS SUBMITTED, IN THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, DOCUMENTATION which HAS THE SAME writing as the original 'letter' (FAKE/ FALSE letter), allegedly from the eldest daughter (now aged 10 yrs old).

The question to ask: WAS ITSUZANNE MOOREWHO

FAKED the 1st letter from the child (WHICH THE POLICE ALSO USED TO TAKE THE CHILDREN AWAY!).

CONTACT SUPERVISORS employed by CAPSTONE VISION :

Viviane Roberts;                       Sarah Young;

Caroline Sprowell;                    Mike Pellat;

Maz McArdie;                           Vicki Feagan;

Pilan Ramiah

CAPSTONEhave, in the last week, STOPPED SUPERVISING CONTACTand in one of their employees WORDS (as a reason for stopping contact and NOT taking the children to contact last week)"WE DO NOT WANT TO COMPROMISE OUR POSITION WITH HARRINGEY" - THEY DO NOT HAVE THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN the the fore - THIS DECISION IS FINANCIAL - HARRINGEY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES will not use their services if THEY DO NOT comply with them, they are a PRIVATE company and rely on Local Authorities payment to ensure their business continues functioning.  So much for privatisation being the best for the economy.

Dr L WalgamaandDr Klepacke,and ofSupervisor Naomi Gerson Sofer of North Middlesex Hospital

Dr Adesida - He wrote a 'report' on behalf of the Courts - COLLUDING WITH THEM! - which was BASED ON THE FAKE / FALSE / FABRICATED ALLEGATIONS / LIES / 'letter' - in 2010. One would guess he HAD NO IDEA JUDGE GLENN BRASSE would state at a later date, the LETTER WAS FAKE AND ALL THE ORIGINAL ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE (February 2011) and there is "NO CASE TO ANSWER".

Carina Fung, Sharon Fair, Joyce Agyekum , Maria Foster,  Cheryl Stewartson and Suzanne Moore, Linda Treen - SOCIAL WORKERS FOR LBH

Carina Fung- not on GSCC Register (General Social Care Council Register - IT IS OBLIGATORY for Social Workers, on the register, TO BE registered in the EXACT name they have on their badge -ID- are registered in the AREA they claim to be working AND

Joyce Agyekum- COMMITTED PURJERY, Perverting the Course of Justice, (THE LIAR SHE IS), Fraud by FALSE REPRESENTATION / ommission, Nonfeasance of Public Office, Personal Malfeasance, Defammation of Character, BULLYING, Intimidation of witnesses(I AM ONE OF THE

WITNESSES JOYCE AGYEKUM HAS INTERFERRED WITH -

IN COLLUSION WITH MS ROSITA MOISE Solicitor for LBH),  LYING both on GSCC Register AND (HARRINGEY MUST BE AWARE OF THIS) to Harringey Social Services Department.

MISS JOYCE AGYEKUMhas ALSO committed the following: Nonfeasance (failing to act when she had/has a duty to do so). Inciting others to commit Perjury, Fraud, Perverting the course of justice. Child abuse - not acting according to correct Procedure  / Protocol when a child has been reported as being in IMMINANT DANGER of SEXUAL ABUSE. Malicious Prosecution, Criminal Libel, Actual Bodily Harm, Negligence and Malpractice.

Alexandra Constantinou (LBH Social Worker) - She is the Children's Guardian - who has seen them approximately 6-10 times - in the past 14 months (AND NEVER ALONE - away from the Foster CARERS).

Ms Jonquil Houghton- Childrens' legal Representative - working for CREIGHTON & PARTNERS - IT APPEARS, (from documentation) SHE HAS NOT EVEN MET the children - TO WHOM SHE HAS A DUTY.

Sally Ayiah(HARINGEY SOCIAL WORKERS THAT PUT STATEMENT IN COURT)

  Elleni Ross, Indira Kartallozi (CARIS)- BOTH of these people work for A HOUSING CHARITY, which 'helps' vulnerable families... INDIRA IS A CLOSE FRIEND OF MICHELLE COLLINS, BOTHIndira AND Michelle Collins fabricated ALLTHE ORIGINAL allegations made April 2010 against this family.

Joy Nwanna (Homerton Hospital) Sunita Kattra, Adam Ahmad, Steven Nkanyuza,

Chantel Palmer(midwife) - MIDWIFE for Baby born June 2010.

Joan McLeish (Health Visitor)-JOAN McLeish- She has perverted the Course of Justice, and Perjury; She HAS NOT AND DID NOT inform the COURT shehas NO CONCERNSwith regard to the health/ well-being of the other children - (except F' - who, since the original allegations).  JUDGEGLENN BRASSEhas since stated ALL original allegations asFAKE AND FALSE.  JOAN MCLEISH (HEALTH VISITOR OR LBH) TOLD Mrs Musa in front of me - Kay Young: "I have never had concerns about the other children, only 'F' because of the letter found in the garden".  She told us this early JANUARY 2011, when she and Joyce Agyekum came to visit Mr and Mrs Musa. EVIDENCE: DIGITAL RECORDING.

Helen George(CAIT)

BAAF Foster CarersDenise and Steven Basset- these FOSTER CARERS have the eldest daughter living with them. They have NOT reported their OWN SON (adult son) for sexually molesting 'F' (aged 9 at the time, 2010).  Their SON is employed by the SAME AGENCY who PAY DENISE AND STEVEN BASSET to look after the children.  OTHER CHILDREN ARE AT SERIOUS RISK OF SIGNIFICANT HARM.

MandyandAlex Celvat, Lana Higgins, Sharon Courtney Wood- FOSTER CARERS OF THE OTHER CHILDREN. One of the original Foster carers 'gave up fostering' after one of the children was in their care - MR AND MRS MUSA have never been notified WHY.

      Headteacher at St Patrick School Manchester

      Headteacher at St Dominic's School and of Stamford Hill Primary.

Dr L Walgama and Dr Klepacke, and of Supervisor Naomi Gerson Sofer of North Middlesex Hospital

Dr Adesida,

Michelle Collins Former  Actress from EASTENDERS - NOW acting in CORONATION STREET
London Metropolitan Police
PC 229379 Kateete        DC 205302 MN Nagra           DS 6575 CA Tonks

DS 197682 IA Watson     PC 227486 N Christie      PC 204489 CG Rae

DS 197940 Pilch    PC 421 YR Caswell     PC 511YR Christie

PC176YR Last    PC 265YR Littleton    PS 37YR Kadiri  DS 7101 BP Smith           

DI McHugh     DC Ashworth      DC 198242 P Still        CIV 84306 H George     

PC 153QK Davies     DC Knight    DC SJ Hayes    PC 4174CW S Lambourne

Inspector PJ Cook            Inspector RJ Webb            DS RM Caws

SERIS Photographic Officer Chris Lewis   Ex 95013 El Stewart

EX 87631 Va McIntyre          Re:  Defamation & Unlawful Kidnap

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Malicious Prosecution: committed by someone who starts (or continues) legal proceedings, without a genuine belief, based on reasonable grounds, that the proceedings are justified. MALICE: proceedings must have been started from an improper or otherwise wrongful motive.

Criminal Libel:  - the test is whether the statement in question would bring the victim into hatred, ridicule and contempt, rather than the alternative formulation of whether it would tend to lower her in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.

CONSPIRACY - limited now to agreements to defraud or to corrupt public morals. - the statutory conspiracy is much wider, covering any agreement to a course of conduct which, if carried out, will either amount to, or involve, an offence. A statutory conspiracy takes two forms. One form, which may conveniently be called conspiracy to injure, exist where two or more people combine with the intention of injuring someone else. To claim for conspiracy, she must show that she has suffered financial loss - not just hurt feelings or harm to her reputation, although she need not show that the conduct of A and B was in its nature, unlawful.

ACTUAL BODILY HARM - injuries such as bruising and minor abrasions, but it is not limited to physical harm and includes psychological harm (such as medically recognised stress).

ABUSE OF POWER - this is by using the power for an improper purpose, by failing to exercise a discretion by reference to legally irrelevant considerations. THE QUEENS BENCH of the HIGH COURT controls the abuse of power through JUDICIAL REVIEW

ABUSE OF PROCESS - Where a court is satisfied that allowing a case to continue would cause significant unfairness to one or more of the parties, it may terminate the proceedings on the basis that their continuation would be an abuse of process (or use a slightly fuller form of the expression, an abuse of process of the court).

PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS - a person must be given  adequate notice of both

.. date, place and time of the hearing (or the last date and time for the submission of written representations), so that he can prepare his case; and

...the case which he will have to answer (and the decision which is made must be based on this information).

(Procedural fairness) THE RULE AGAINST BIAS - is breached if a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased.

(procedural fairness) - THE RIGHT TO BE GIVEN REASONS - a person affected by a decision should be given sufficient information  to allow them to assess the legality of the decision- making process and, where an appeal is available, decide whether there are grounds for appeal. Additionally, the duty to give reasons concentrates the decision-makers mind on precisely what the reasons are:

THE DOCTRINE of procedural ULTRA VIRES states that a decision-maker who fails to comply with specific procedural requirements laid down by STATUTE OR DELEGATED LEGISLATION is acting unlawfully... - THIS IS IF IT IS MANDATORY (E.G COMPULSORY)  

ARTICLE 6 ECHR -  breach or rights, not only 'the trial' but the whole process of a trial.

PERJURY - someone who has been lawfully sworn as a witness in judicial proceedings, he wilfully (or - in other words - not by mistake or carelessness) makes a statement which is false, provided that he either knew it was false or did not believe it to be true.

INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD and MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD - Injurious falsehood and malicious falsehood are alternative names for a single tort. The TORT consists of maliciously making a false statement about a person or his property, with the result that the other people are deceived and consequently act in a way which causes loss to that person. The requirement of malice involves either the absence of an honest belief in the truth of the statement, or the presence of a dishonest or other improper motive.

FRAUD  - can be committed in three ways: 'false representation', 'failing to disclose information', and 'abuse of position'.

THE FIRST ELEMENT OF ALL THREE - THERE MUST be dishonesty. The defendant must intend tomake a gain for himself or someone else to a risk of loss. Gains and losses may be either temporary or permanent but they MUST TAKE THE FORM of either PERSONAL PROPERTY or

FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION - is committed by dishonestly making a false representation, which may be either express or implied and may be as to a matter of either fact or law, including a state of mind. A representation is false, or may be untrue or misleading and the person making it knows that it is, or may be, the case.  

FRAUD BY FAILING TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION -  is committed where the failure to disclose is dishonest and there is a legal duty to make the disclosure.

FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION -  is committed where the defendant dishonestly abuses a position which he holds and in which he is expected either to safeguard (or, at least, not act against) the financial interests of someone else.

DECEIT - is committed by a person who makes a false statement (either knowing, or being reckless as to whether, it is false) with the intention that another person shall act upon it; and that other person DOES IN FACT ACT UPON IT, and suffers loss as a result.

NEGLIGENCE - Broadly speaking, the TORT of negligence is committed by a defendant who:

...owes the claimant a duty of care, and who

...breaches that duty; thus

...causing harm to the claimant.

Liability for BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY - may arise from a breach of EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW or from a breach of a CONVENTION RIGHT UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998.

MALADMINISTRATION - 

DEFAMATION - defamation is an umbrella term for two TORTS, namely libel and slander. The purpose of both torts is to protect interests in reputation, so the most useful short definition of them is the publication of a false statement about someone to his discredit.

the requirement of publication simply means communication to a third party, while the word 'statement' includes anything (such as a gesture) which is capable of conveynig meaning. 
Misfeasance in public office -  the TORT of misfeasance of public office is committed where a public office acts either:

* Maliciously with the intention of harming the claimant, or

* Knowing both that she has no power to do the act in question and that that act will probably injure the claimant; and

* in either case, the act does harm the claimant.

Breach of statutory duty - 'failure to p erform a duty whic is imposed upon him by statute.'

Breach of the peace - AT COMMON LAW there is a breach of the peace where there is behaviour which harms, or is likely to harm, a person, or which puts him in fear of harm to himself, or to his property, provided the property is present at the time.

Codification - drawing legislation in an area of law e.g. criminal or family, into a code

Section 8 orders - a range of orders provided for in section 8 of the Children Act 1989 which deal with aspects of the exercise of parental responsibility, namely, residence, contact, specific issue and prohibited steps orders.

Ex parte - an application made to court WITHOUT GIVING NOTICE  to the other party, usually referred to as 'without notice.'

Duty - a MANDATORY obligation to carry out a particular function, something which the authority shall do.

De facto - in fact, actual

Children's Guardian - an independent officer who represents a child in court, part of the CAFCASS organisation  (formerly known as the guardian ad litem)

FAMILY PROCEEDINGS COURT - the branch of the magistrates' court which deals with family and child care isses.

FACT IN ISSUE - a point which parties to a case cannot agree upon and requires evidential proof

Barrister - A Lawyer who typically specialises in Court advocacy - also referred to as counsel

Cause of action - the basis of a civil case, the reason for suing.

Amicus curiae - friend of the court

Fact in issue - a point which parties to a case cannot agree upon and requires evidential proof.

Revision - of statutes, a process of updating law.

Natural justice - more commonly referred to as fairness.  The ntitlement to the law applying fairness in accordance with its basic principles such as the right to make representations and to know of ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE AGAINST YOU, in order to have a fair hearing.

Negligence - a tort based on three principles: the existence of a duty of care, breach of that duty and damage from the breach.

No case to answer - a submission made by the defence ina criminal case that the prosecution have failed to establish the existence of a case AGAINST THE ACCUSED.

Ultra Vires - outside the powers given to the body in question, i.e.' unlawful action.

'defammation' - depends on whether it would lower the claimant in estimation of right thinking members of society.LIBEL is WRITTEN, SLANDER is  SPOKEN. The functional distinction between libel and slander us that libel is always actionable oer se (or, in other words, an action will succeed even if the claimant cannot prove that he was actually harmed by the libel), while slander is, generally, actionable only on proof of special damage (or in other words, the claimant must prove that the statement caused him harm which can be quantified in terms of money).

DEFAMMATION -  'publication of a false statement about someone to his discredit'. - publication means: coomunication to a third party, while the word 'statement' includes anything (such as a gesture) which is capable of conveying meaning. (the claimant MUST PROVE that the statement caused him harm which can be quantified in terms of money.

Look forward to putting Part 4 of the MUSA Family Values later this week. We will look at court documents and how many times requests went ignored from lawyers to the courts and the infraction of Human Rights Violations that continue to plague the Musa's

Adamitenews on Twitter
Adamitenews Network Blog
Adamitenews on Youtube
Adamite News on Facebook